Log in


<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   Next >  Last >> 
  • 20 Sep 2021 5:11 PM | Sylvia (Administrator)

    Council conducted a survey to gauge community support for the creation of an RV Friendly parking area, but did they inform the community of the possible cost? The original proposal was to utilise existing Council infrastructure, requiring minimal modification i.e. the Mossman Show Grounds or land adjacent to the Newell Beach Golf Course, not spend unbudgeted funds to buy more Council land.  No decision has been made yet but if we are all being told to tighten our belts is it unreasonable to expect that Council do the same? What do you think?

  • 12 Aug 2021 5:48 PM | Sylvia (Administrator)

    The Council has release plans for a “green ant” themed playground under the old fig tree in Rex Smeal Park.  Community consultation closes on the 27th August,  have your say by sending an email to  To see the concept plan click on the following link   

  • 14 Jul 2021 11:57 AM | Sylvia (Administrator)

    The DSRA has since it’s inception lobbied council to undertake a review of the General Rates Category system.   There were major inequities in the system, particularly in what was Category 8 – apartments and units.   A big tick to Council for doing the review BUT there has been NO CONSULTATION on what is arguably one of the most important issues for ratepayers particularly when rates have increased AGAIN by 2.8%  (CPI 1.1%).   An example of anything but “consultation and transparency”,  two words we hear Councillors  continually voice their commitment to but we certainly haven’t seen on this important issue.    Did they get it right?  Let us know your thoughts.

  • 24 Jun 2021 7:32 PM | Sylvia (Administrator)

    The DSRA will be holding it's Annual General Meeting at 4pm, 15th July 2021 at the Palmer Sea Reef Golf Club.  For a copy of the Agenda click here DSRA 2021 AGM Agenda.pdf   Updates to the Constitution are proposed.  To view the proposed amended Constitution, go to "About Us / Constitution".   If you would like to nominate for a position on the Committee please complete the nomination form (click here) DSRA Committee Nomination Form.pdf and email to by the Thursday 8th July 2021.    We look forward to seeing you there!

  • 3 May 2021 10:14 AM | Sylvia (Administrator)

    It is no secret that the Douglas Shire is in dire need of major infrastructure development in the area of water and waste management, not just to keep up with current demands, but future requirements.   This will place a huge cost burden on current ratepayers if not appropriately managed by Council.  At the Ordinary Council meeting held on the 30th March,  Councillors unanimously voted in favour of a Debt General Policy which stated  “At this stage, Council’s 10-year financial forecast does not include any planned borrowings…”.  How then is this Council going to ensure that there is an equitable distribution of the cost burden for infrastructure development? Today’s ratepayers should not bare the full burden of cost for assets that future ratepayers will benefit from.   Queensland Treasury Corporation offers a rolling debt fund for this very purpose and to ensure Councils keep infrastructure up to date without unrealistic pressure on ratepayers. 

    In the lead up to the Council election, the previous Council proudly reported the very low  debt rate in Council.  The cost of this has been persistent and disproportionate increases in rates and charges in this Shire.   The current Council seems to be taking the same approach.  

    Will ratepayers be facing more unnecessary rates and charges increases in the Shire?  We will watch with interest.

  • 3 May 2021 10:11 AM | Sylvia (Administrator)

    Many believe that the beautiful Rosewood trees on Warner Street died because the tree roots were destroyed when Council conducted their “targeted operational work”, not the result of poisoning.   We look forward to seeing the detailed report from the independent arborist.  Council have now decided to reconsider the removal of the trees as signs of life have now been shown.

  • 20 Apr 2021 3:36 PM | Sylvia (Administrator)

    At the last Douglas Shire Council meeting Councillors voted to rescind part of a previous unanimous decision by Councillors to give the owner of Lot 2 (adjacent to the esplanade in Port Douglas), approval to apply to the State government for a permanent closure of the road reserve (esplanade) for development purposes.   Click here to see the development application which was on the Council website in December but seemed to have been overlooked by some Councillors.

    During the meeting The Deputy Mayor Lisa Scomazzon expressed her concern about a lack of information being provided at the previous Council meeting.   Councillors Noli, Zammataro and Deputy Mayor Lisa Scomazzon voted to reverse the previous decision. 

    To here the live stream of the Council meeting click here:     

    Lisa Scomazzon and Michael Kerr discuss their points of view on the matter in a POD cast with FabFM’s Paul Makin.  Click here

  • 10 Apr 2021 4:08 PM | Sylvia (Administrator)

    Is Council considering removing coconut palms from our beach foreshore or reducing access points to our beaches?  The Douglas Shire Council is developing Foreshore Management Plans for Wonga Beach, Newell Beach, Cooya Beach, Four Mile Beach and Oak Beach which will determine how our beaches are managed.  The Council is currently running a survey as part of a community consultation process.  Some questions in the survey may give us clues about the direction being considered i.e. coconut palms are listed with lantana and singapore daisy as  “invasive” species  that should be removed.  Another survey question asks  “do you support minimising the number of access paths to the beach…?” and “should informal private access paths be removed?”  Make sure you have your say and carefully consider how you respond.  Go to the following link to complete the survey  Douglas Foreshore Community Survey (  Remember you need to complete a survey for each beach.

  • 11 Jan 2021 11:46 AM | Sylvia (Administrator)

    At the December Douglas Shire Council meeting, the Mayor stated that “the majority of the community has spoken” in favour of the two ferry option.   For clarity, there were 3,409 responses to the Douglas Shire Council (DSC) survey.   Nearly 20% of those respondents were not from the Shire (neither a ratepayer or resident).    Only 22% of Douglas Shire residents and ratepayers responded to the survey.    In effect only 8% of the Shire’s residents and ratepayers voted for a two ferry option.  While the survey participation was significantly greater than the survey conducted by the previous Council, it can hardly be called the majority of the Shire.

    The consultants engaged at considerable expense by Council, recommended a bridge as the best option.  The DSRA poll showed 64% of respondents (all ratepayers), voted in favour of the bridge. Quite a different result from the DSC survey. 

    We all know you can spin statistics in favour of any argument.  However, given that the DSC survey (not referendum) was simplistic and with very little (if any) discussion about it’s statistical validity, it is concerning that it seems to be the primary tool determining the Councils decision on this.

    At the recent DSC meeting, Councillor Scomazzon was the only Councillor who acknowledged and showed concern that it is the ratepayers and tourist operators who will shoulder the cost of the two ferry option (estimated at a 2.75% increase in rates) and that more consideration should be given on the matter.

    Do we really have a long term sustainable vision for Cape Tribulation?  It has been estimated that in 5yrs time (possibly less with the projected increase in domestic travel), waiting periods with two ferries will be at the same levels they are now with one ferry.   Will we then be voting for four ferries?  Is Council just kicking the can down the road on this?

    To view the full DSC Dec meeting click on the link

  • 11 Jan 2021 11:42 AM | Sylvia (Administrator)

    In response to DSRA’s   request for an update, the Douglas Shire Council CEO Mark Stoermer advised that Councillors have met to discuss the review of the General Rate Category system which the DSRA have been pushing for since before the last Council election.    This grossly inequitable system places an unfair burden on owners of property on Community Title Schemes, (Category 8) and is in desperate need of a review.     We look forward to being proactively engaged  and consulted by Council on this matter.  The DSC has also lobbied for some time to have a Land Valuation review in the Shire. It has been over 4 years since the last Valuation.   The CEO advised that a request has  been submitted and they are waiting for a response from the State Government.

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   Next >  Last >> 

Email -

Address - PO Box 969, Mossman  QLD 4877

ABN 46 257 394 374


Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software